Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shahana And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 40
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 34305 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shahana And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 24.09.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 1014 of 2018, under Sections 498A, 323, 313 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Katghar, District Moradabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged by the respondent no. 4 roping in the entire family of her husband (non-petitioner) including his mother, sister, brother-in-law (bahnoi), mediator, Tauqeer, sister-in-law (bhabhi) and brothers falsely alleging commission of offences by them under Sections 498A, 323, 313 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act. The specific allegation regarding commission of offence under Section 313 I.P.C. has been made against the petitioner no. 6. Moreover apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F.I.R., no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity and hence the impugned F.I.R. qua petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned A.G.A. submitted that from the perusal of the impugned FIR and on the basis of the allegation made therein, it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is disclosed against the petitioners.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned FIR, we are not inclined to quash the same.
However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that investigation of the aforesaid case shall go on but the petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 shall not be arrested till the submission of police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. subject to their extending full co- operation during investigation.
As far as petitioner no. 6 is concerned, who is the brother-in-law (jeth) of the respondent no. 4, the petition stands dismissed. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner appears before the court concerned within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below.
With the aforesaid directions, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.11.2018 SA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shahana And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2018
Judges
  • Bala Krishna Narayana
Advocates
  • Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui