Mr. Maulvi, learned Advocate appearing for learned Advocate Mr. Shakeel A. Qureshi for the applicant states that they have yet to verify the fact that whether deposit is made or not.
Mr. Anil Mehta appearing on behalf of learned Advocate Mr. K.J. Shethna states that in fact, they are not appearing for the respondent no. 2 in the present case, their names are wrongly shown. They had appeared only in application for condonation of delay Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Wed Jan 20 02:21:34 IST 2016 R/CR.RA/172/2007 ORDER in filing such petitions.
The applicant and the registry have to verify such fact. If it is so, registry has to verify the proper service upon the respondent no. 2. If it is not served in regular revision application, let there be a fresh notice.
Meanwhile, the applicant has to verify the fact regarding deposit.
List after four weeks.
(S.G.SHAH, J.) ak verma Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Jan 20 02:21:34 IST 2016