Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shah Alam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 54
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11188 of 2019 Petitioner :- Shah Alam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the first information report dated 3.4.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 155 of 2019, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B I.P.C., police station Pilkhuwa, district Hapur.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the first information report has been lodged by the complainant with the allegation that the petitioner has indulged in extracting illegal money by making forged and fabricated documents. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire prosecution story is the outcome of personal grudge of the respondent no 3. There is nothing on record to substantiate the allegation made against the petitioner rather it reflects the manoeuvring on the part of the respondent no. 3. Therefore, the first information report so lodged by the respondent no. 3 is liable to be quashed.
Per contra the learned A.G.A. contended that the allegations contained in the first information report cannot be nipped in the bud. There are sufficient material showing the complicity of the petitioner. The innocence of the petitioner cannot be adjudged at this stage.
From perusal of the F.I.R., prima facie cognizable offences is made out at this stage against the petitioner therefore, we do not find any cogent or convincing reason to quash the first information report. The prayer for quashing the first information report is refused.
However, in the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case till the submission of police report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., subject to the restraint that the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and shall appear as and when called upon to assist in the investigation.
With the above direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 Shahnawaz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shah Alam vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2019
Judges
  • Naheed Ara Moonis
Advocates
  • Rama Shankar Mishra