Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shadmaan And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37893 of 2019 Applicant :- Shadmaan And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rana Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Sri Ronak Chaturvedi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the informant, which is taken on record.
Heard Sri Amit Rana, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ronak Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have stated that on the basis of X-ray report and supplementary report the case has now been converted under Section 307 I.P.C. In view of it, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable.
Learned counsel for the applicants states that the present application may be dismissed as withdrawn and he shall approach the Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail under Section 307 I.P.C.
The present Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 25.9.2019 Vikas
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shadmaan And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 September, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Amit Rana