Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Guruvaiah vs The Principal Secretary To ...

Madras High Court|03 April, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioners, having retired from service as Checking Inspector/Senior Tradesman/Traffic Inspector/Senior Assistant in the respondent Corporation on 31.7.2014, 31.7.2016, 28.2.2015, 31.1.2016, 30.9.2013 respectively, have filed these writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondents to settle all the retirement benefits payable to them, as prayed for in the writ petitions, with interest at 18% per annum.
2. Mr.K.Venkataramani, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader for the State and Mr.P.Kannankumar, learned standing counsel for the Transport Corporation submitted that since there has been a direction issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.6.2015 directing the Corporation to disburse all the retiral benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments with 6% interest per annum, a similar direction may be issued in these writ petitions also.
3. This Court, recording the statement made by the learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents, taking note of the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.6.2015 (K.Rajendran and others v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited represented by its Managing Director, Madurai and others) directing the respondents to settle all the retirement benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments with 6% interest per annum, hereby directs the respondents to settle the entire retirement benefits due and payable to the petitioners through twelve equal monthly instalments carrying interest of 6% p.a. The instalments should commence from June, 2017 and each of the instalments should be paid on or before 7th of each month. In case of any delay in the payment of the instalments, the interest payable would become 18% p.a. for the delayed period apart from any other remedy which may be available to the petitioners for such non-payment of the instalments. With this direction, the writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Guruvaiah vs The Principal Secretary To ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
03 April, 2017