Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Settypalli Hema Chandana vs Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|29 August, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2017 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B A PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.36399/2017 (EDN–MED–ADM) BETWEEN:
Settypalli Hema Chandana, D/o S.Srinivasa Rao, Aged about 18 years, C/o Group Captain SS Rao, OMQ P-49, Head Quarter Training Command, IAF, J.C. Nagar Post, Bangalore – 560 006 (By Sri.Sharath S Gowda, Advocate) AND:
1. Union of India, Department of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi – 110 077, Represented by its Secretary.
2. Medical Council of India, Pocket No.14, Sector 8, Dwaraka Phase – I, ... PETITIONER New Delhi – 110 077 Represented by its Secretary.
3. State of Karnataka, Department of Medical Education, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Vikasa Soudha, Bangalore – 560 001.
4. Director of Medical Education, Represented by its Director, Anand Rao Circle, Gandhinagar, Bangalore – 560 009.
5. Karnataka Examination Authority, Represented by its Executive Director, Sampige Road, 18th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore – 560 012.
... RESPONDENTS (By Smt.S.R.Sinchana, CGSC for R1; Sri.N.Khetty, Advocate for R2;
Sri.Sridhar Hegde, HCGP for R3 & R4; Sri.N.K.Ramesh, Advocate for R5) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondent authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.08.2017 and allot seat to the petitioner as per her ranking in MCJ Medical College Hoskote which is opted at Sl.No.61 under Karnataka GM Category as verified by the respondent authorities vide Annexure – N and etc., This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in 'B' Group this day, JAYANT PATEL J, made the following:
ORDER Mr.Sharath S.Gowda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner tenders the memo for withdrawal of the Writ Petition declaring that the petitioner has been granted admission and therefore, the petitioner is not desirous to pursue the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record. Permission granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Prs*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Settypalli Hema Chandana vs Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
29 August, 2017
Judges
  • B A Patil
  • Jayant Patel