After some arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, even though the order passed by the Executive Magistrate, which is impugned herein, directed both parties to maintain the Status Quo, and according to the petitioner, the same is infringing the right of the petitioner herein, however, he would approach the competent civil court to establish his right by filing an appropriate proceedings in the manner known to law.
2. The learned counsel would submit that if the petitioner is permitted to approach the competent civil court to establish his right, he would be satisfied atleast for the present.
3. Considering the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn as the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made an endorsement to that effect, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil court in the manner known to law.
4. It is needless to state that all the observations made in the order impugned shall no way influence the competent civil court in deciding the matter in accordance with law, when it is approached by the petitioner. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.08.2017 rli Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To
1. The learned Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Sub Collector, Tirupattur, Vellore.
R.SURESH KUMAR.J.
rli
2. The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Sub-Collector, Tirupathur, Vellore District.
3. The Tahsildar Tirupattur, Vellore District.
4. The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Rural Police Station, Tiruppattur, Vellore District.
Crl. RC. No.1037 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.9779 of 2017 04.08.2017