Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Selvaraj vs Venkataraman

Madras High Court|01 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
ub It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
01.02.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To
1. The District Munsif/Rent Controller, Mayiladuthurai.
2. The Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai.
C.R.P.No.4000 of 2012
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Selvaraj vs Venkataraman

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
01 February, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran