Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Seetu @ Ranvijay vs State Of U

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13527 of 2021 Applicant :- Seetu @ Ranvijay Opposite Party :- State Of U,P And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Srivastava Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 118 of 2021, under Section - 272 I.P.C. and Section - 60 (2), 72 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, Police Station - Gunnaur, District - Sambhal, during the pendency of trial.
Contention, in brief, is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence whatsoever has been committed by the applicant. The name of the applicant has surfaced in the confessional statement of the co- accused. The applicant has no nexus with the offence in question. The allegations levelled against the applicant are vague and baseless and without any substance.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
After considering the rival submissions raised by both the parties and the averments contained in this anticipatory bail application, obviously the documents placed on record carry substantive allegations, which have been backed up by the sufficient material against the applicants. No good ground is made out for interference.
However, the relief sought by the applicant can be well obtained by moving appropriate regular bail application before the court concerned. Therefore, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the court concerned and moves appropriate application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the court concerned on the same day.
With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of.
The observation made herein above will have no bearing upon the merit of the case.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 / S Rawat Digitally signed by Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra Date: 2021.07.28 17:01:04 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Seetu @ Ranvijay vs State Of U

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 July, 2021
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Mishra I
Advocates
  • Gaurav Srivastava