Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Seeta Kumari @ Seeta Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3221 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Seeta Kumari @ Seeta Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
Although, the learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the order of transfer, he submits that the ends of justice would merit the petitioner being permitted to represent against the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the petitioner shall join the place of posting within two weeks and represent her case to the second respondent within two weeks, from today.
Learned Standing Counsel states that in case the petitioner joins the place of posting as per the statement made above and continues to work on that post any representation that may be made within a period of two weeks from today, shall be considered and disposed of by the second respondent in accordance with law and within a period of one month therefrom.
Accordingly and in light of the statement so made, which is recorded and accepted, nothing further survives on this petition, which shall in consequence stand disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 Arun K. Singh (Yashwant Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Seeta Kumari @ Seeta Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Daya Shanker Pandey