Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Seeni vs The District Superintendant Of ...

Madras High Court|16 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition is filed for a direction to the second respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 05.10.2017.
2.Heard Mr.R.Murugappan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.Ramar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who takes notice for the respondents.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced before this Court, the closure report, wherein the Sub-Inspector of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District, stated that they have conducted an enquiry and found that the incident is nothing beyond a wordy quarrel and that nothing had happened, as it was alleged by petitioner. The report was on the basis of a preliminary enquiry, after examining the neighbors and the complaint was closed.
4.As a result, the Criminal Original Petition is closed accordingly.
To
1.The District Superintendant of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Inspector of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Seeni vs The District Superintendant Of ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 November, 2017