Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Seema Kandpal vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. (Home) & ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved by her non-selection in U.P. Police Constable Direct Recruitment Examination 2009.
The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has scored 99.725 marks whereas candidates with lesser marks have been selected. Secondly, petitioner has not been awarded appropriate marks in some of the questions attempted and correctly answered by her.
Learned Standing Counsel contends that if the petitioner is aggrieved by his non selection he can raise the objection before the U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow which shall be considered and decided by a reasoned order.
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before respondent no.2, U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow and in case any such objection/representation is filed by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent no.2 in accordance with law within a period of three weeks thereafter. Till disposal of the representation one post shall be kept reserved for the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 23.6.2010 SKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Seema Kandpal vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. (Home) & ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 June, 2010