Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2009
  6. /
  7. January

S.Deviannai vs R.M.Subbu

Madras High Court|06 August, 2009

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner/wife filed this petition to transfer the H.M.O.P.No.40 of 2009, which was filed by the respondent/husband on the file of Sub court, Pudukkottai, seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. It is seen from the affidavit filed by the petitioner that the marriage was solemnized on 06.06.2008 and H.M.O.P.No.40 of 2009, was filed on 18.02.2009 within a short span of 7 months. Though, certain allegations are made in H.M.O.P.No.40 of 2009, this court is not inclined to go into the details as only the transfer petition is filed before this court. It is curious to note that the petitioner and the respondent are residing in Trichy and they led their matrimonial life also in Trichy. However, the respondent/husband chose to file the petition before the Sub Court, Pudukkottai.
2.Though, the learned counsel for the respondent/husband contended that the marriage was celebrated at Pudukkottai and that was the cause of action which made him to file the said petition before the Sub Court, Pudukkottai. However, this contention is not convincing especially when the petitioner and respondent were living together before separation in Trichy and after separation also are living in Trichy. Hence, the petitioner filed before Pudukkottai Court is clearly an abuse of process of court by the respondent/husband to harass the petitioner/wife to make her to go to Pudukkottai to appear before the Sub Court Pudukkottai.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that taking into consideration of the fact that the petitioner as well as the respondent are living in Trichy, it is unnecessary to travel to Pudukkottai to appear before the Sub Court, Pudukkottai. The petitioner/wife being a lady, she also expressed her inability to travel long distance to Pudukkottai.
4.For the reasons already recorded by this court, H.M.O.P.No.40 of 2009, has to be transferred to Sub Court, Trichy. For having abused the process of law, the respondent has to be burdened with some amount as cost, the respondent is directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) in cash to the petitioner/wife. The said amount has to be paid to the wife before the Sub Court, Trichy in the first hearing and the learned Sub Judge is directed to verify whether the cost was paid by the husband. Only after filing of proof for the said payment by the husband the Sub Court, Trichy is directed to proceed with the matter further. Accordingly, the petition is disposed. No costs.
ns
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Deviannai vs R.M.Subbu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
06 August, 2009