IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.493 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
M/S. SCICOM CONTACT CENTRE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.124/125, "NENAPU" GROUND FLOOR, 14TH CROSS 2ND B MAIN ROAD, SOUNDARYA LAYOUT, HESSARGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 073, PAN:AAJCS 3726 P, (REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. LEO SURESH ARIYANAYAKAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SON OF GEORGE ARIYANAYAKAM).
...APPELLANT (BY SRI CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(3), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT. ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.02.2018 PASSED IN MP NO.311/BANG/2017 IN IT(TP)A NO.173/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU SMC ‘A’ BENCH, BENGALURU IN MP NO.311/BANG/2017 IN IT(TP)A NO.173/BANG/2012, DATED 16.02.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006; ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A, ETC.
***** THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal be dismissed as being infructuous.
Ordered as such.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE JJ