Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sayyub vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3230 of 2019 Revisionist :- Sayyub Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sadaful Islam Jafri,Shri Nazrul Islam Jafri, Senior Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist against the judgment and order dated 20.5.2019 passed by Additional Session Judge, Court No.10, Meerut in Criminal Appeal No.76 of 2014 whereby the appeal preferred on behalf of revisionist has been dismissed and the order dated 06.03.2014 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Meerut in Criminal Case No.1223 of 2013 arising out of Case Crime No.262 of 2001 (State Vs. Ansar and others), under section 147, 323/149, 325/149 I.P.C., P.S.- Mundali, District- Meerut has been affirmed whereby the revisionist has been convicted and sentenced under section 147 I.P.C. to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- and one year of additional imprisonment in default payment of fine, six months rigorous imprisonment under section 323/149 I.P.C. and five years rigorous imprisonment under section 325/149 I.P.C. with fine of Rs.5,000/- and three months of additional imprisonment in default payment of fine.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, who has pressed forth the revision only on the ground of severity of sentence, and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Perused the record.
Admit only to hear on the point of sentence.
Summon the lower court record.
Notice on behalf of opposite party no.1 has been accepted by learned A.G.A.
Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 returnable within four weeks.
Opposite party no.2 may file counter affidavit within three weeks after the service. Learned A.G.A. may also file counter affidavit within the same period. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List this matter immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period along with lower court record before the appropriate bench.
In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, let the revisionist- Sayyub, convicted and sentenced in Criminal Case No.1223 of 2013 arising out of Case Crime No.262 of 2001 (State Vs. Ansar and others), under section 147, 323/149, 325/149 I.P.C., P.S.- Mundali, District- Meerut, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties each of his family members and/or relatives to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
As soon as personal and surety bonds are furnished, photostat copies of the same are directed to be transmitted to this Court forthwith by the concerned court below to be kept on record.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 shiv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sayyub vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Sadaful Islam Jafri Shri Nazrul Islam Jafri Senior