Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Savitri Devi vs State Of U P Thru ' Principal Secy And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3602 of 2005 Petitioner :- Smt. Savitri Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Sharma,K.K. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the balance amount of the revised pay scale not paid to the petitioner from dated 31.1.1991.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the balance of revised salary along with the increments with the interest."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018
Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Savitri Devi vs State Of U P Thru ' Principal Secy And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar Sharma K K Dwivedi