Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Savitri Bai And Others vs The Principal Secretary And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|16 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.48045-48047 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT SAVITRI BAI, W/O LATE RAMA NAIK D AGED 67 YEARS, R/AT:NARASIMHARAJAPURA, BILICHOD HOBLI, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577553.
2. SRI K.V.RAJAPPA, S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT:KIRUMANI VILLAGE, BYRAKUR POST, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563131.
3. SRI K.M.APPOJI REDDY, S/O LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT:KADIRIPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.
(BY MR.H.RAMACHANDRA, ADV.) AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVT.OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001.
… PETITIONERS 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTER OF ENERGY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001.
3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RENEWABLE ENERGY, DEVELOPMENT LTD., GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE – 1.
4. SRI ISHWER MATGAR, AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT S/O SHIVALINGAPPA MATAGAR, AS PER COURT ODER HUKKERI TALUK, DATED 9/6/2015 BELGAUM DIST., … RESPONDENTS (BY MR.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2 (MA NOT FILED) MR.MURUGESH V.CHARATI ADV., FOR R3, MR.NANDISH PATEL, ADV. FOR R4) - - -
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE SELECTION LIST ANNX-Z1 DTD 09.10.2014 AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER None for the petitioner, when the matter is taken up at 4.00 p.m.
Mr.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent.
2. In these petitions, petitioner inter alia seeks quashment of the order dated 09.10.2014 contained in Annexure-Z1.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
4. The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE SS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Savitri Bai And Others vs The Principal Secretary And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
16 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe