IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA REVIEW PETITION No.530/2019 IN W.P.NO.38999/2018 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
SMT. SAVITHA SRIVELU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D/O SRI. K. SRIVELU, R/AT NO.911, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, 9TH ‘B’ MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 043.
PRESENT ADDRESS 102, SADAGOPAN STREET NORTH UDAYARAPALYAM, ATHUR, SELAM, TAMILNADU – 636 102. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI A.V. AMARNATHAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
UNNIKRISHNAN KADANKOTE S/O. SRI P.V. NARAYANAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, KADANKOTE HOUSE, ADUTHILA, PAYANGADI, KANNUR KERALA – 670 303.
PRESENT ADDRESS A–202 ESHANYA SAMRUDDI TELICOM LAYOUT, HBR LAYOUT, 5TH BLOCK, 39TH CROSS, BENGALURU – 560 043. ... RESPONDENT ***** THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC., PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN W.P.NO.38999/2018 AND A) REVIEW THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT ON 06/09/2018 IN W.P.NO.38999/2018. B) THE PETITIONER PRAYS THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER/S IN THE INTEREST OF MINOR GIRL CHILD IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION THIS DAY, COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for petitioner submits that on account of the order passed by this Court on 06/09/2018 in W.P.No.38999/2018, the family Court is not passing final order. Hence, this review petition has been filed.
2. The said submission of learned counsel, Sri A.V.Amaranathan, is placed on record. The review petition filed for the aforesaid reason is wholly misconceived.
3. In the order dated 06/09/2018, it has been categorically directed as under:-
“The Family Court is directed to dispose of the petition filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with law.
Both parties are directed to co-operate with the concerned Family Court for expeditious disposal of the petition filed by the petitioner herein.
Any observation made during the course of this order is only for the purpose of this writ petition and ought not to influence the Family Court while considering and disposing the main petition.
Writ petition is disposed off in the aforesaid terms.
No costs.”
4. In view of the same, petitioner to take steps for seeking early disposal of the petition before the family Court. Review petition is hence, dismissed.
In view of the dismissal of the review petition, I.A.No.I/2019 stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE *mvs