Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Saurabh Jain @ Sheru vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41499 of 2021 Applicant :- Saurabh Jain @ Sheru Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Maneesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Saurabh Jain @ Sheru seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 305 of 2021, under Section 60 of Excise Act and 272 of I.P.C. P.S.- Kotwali Karwi, District- Chitrakoot.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Applicant has not committed the alleged offences. Alleged recovery of 10 liters illicit liquor, 1 kg. Urea and 30 pouches Whisky have not been recovered from the possession of the applicant. He further submitted that co-accused Sanjay Jaiswal has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 38869 of 2021, vide order dated 03.12.2021 and claimed parity. There are no criminal antecedents of the applicant. He next submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.08.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, however, conceded the factum of parity.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction, complicity of accused and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
In view the above on the ground of parity a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Saurabh Jain @ Sheru involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 21.12.2021 v.k.updh.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Saurabh Jain @ Sheru vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Maneesh Kumar