Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Satyendra Tiwari vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17696 of 2021 Applicant :- Satyendra Tiwari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kishore Pandey,Himanshu Raghav Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rahul Singh,Rakesh Kumar
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State is present. Sri Rahul Singh and Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned counsels for the first informant are also not present.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyendra Tiwari vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2021
Judges
  • Samit Gopal
Advocates
  • Ram Kishore Pandey Himanshu Raghav Pandey