Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satyendra Singh Tomar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7694 of 2018 Petitioner :- Satyendra Singh Tomar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Tandon,Akshay Mohiley Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.
Heard Sri learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the respondents-State and perused the record.
The petition for writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred with a prayer to quash the Case Crime No.0060 of 2018 pending investigation at Police Station Noida Sector-58, District Gautam Budh Nagar pertaining to offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case is made out against the petitioner for the offences referred in the first information report.
Having considered the facts stated in the first information report, we do not find any just reason to quash the first information report as that discloses commission of an offence cognizable.
However, looking to the nature of the case and other surrounding circumstances, we deem it appropriate to direct the respondent no.3 Station House Officer not to arrest the petitioner Satyendra Singh Tomar in relation to first information report referred to above till submission of the police report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 Bhaskar (Ashok Kumar, J.) (Govind Mathur, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyendra Singh Tomar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2018
Judges
  • Govind Mathur
Advocates
  • Shishir Tandon Akshay Mohiley