Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Satyendra Kumar Pathak And Anr. vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Vishnu Chandra Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
We have been taken through the allegations contained in the F.I.R. and the material on record.
The victim petitioner no.2 is present in the Court and has been identified by her counsel.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that she has married with petitioner no.1 out of her own free will and both are major.
Issue notice to respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 who may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Learned A.G.A. may also file counter affidavit within the same period. Rejoinder affidavit may thereafter be filed within two weeks.
List this matter after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Till the next date of listing, the arrest of the petitioners, namely, Satyendra Kumar Pathak and Ranjana Dubey, who are involved in case crime no..485 of 2012 under Sections 366 P.S. Inayat Nagar, District Faizabad shall remain stayed.
Order Date :- 24.5.2012 S. Kumar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyendra Kumar Pathak And Anr. vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 May, 2012
Judges
  • Imtiyaz Murtaza
  • Vishnu Chandra Gupta