Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satyavrat Rai vs State Of U P And O Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22178 of 2019 Petitioner :- Satyavrat Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And O2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard Rajeev Chaddha learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned AGA and perused the record.
The limited relief claimed in this writ petition is that an appropriate direction be issued to respondent No. 1 to consider and dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 433 Cr.P.C.
Learned AGA submits that no purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending, it may be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is 'disposed of' with a direction that in the event the petitioner files a certified copy of this order before respondent No. 1, the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the application (annexure-1 to the writ petition) as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, preferably within three months from the date of production of the same.
We clarify that we have not examined the merits of the claim of the petitioner.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 AS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyavrat Rai vs State Of U P And O Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Rajeev Chaddha