Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satyaveer @ Kuldeep vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27041 of 2016 Applicant :- Satyaveer @ Kuldeep Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari,Arvind Kumar Dohare Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by accused- applicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No.29 of 2016 under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station- Bela, District-Auraiya.
3. It is contended that applicant has been falsely implicated, but record shows that FIR version is not only corroborated by statement of Informant but also in the statement of victim/prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., she has clearly fortified the prosecution version implicating the accused-applicant of committing rape upon her. In her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before concerned Magistrate (Copy whereof is at Page 67 of Paper Book), the prosectrix has also corroborated the FIR version. I am also informed that trial is still going on and had not concluded.
4. Looking into entire facts and circumstances, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail.
5. Application is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyaveer @ Kuldeep vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anand Pati Tiwari Arvind Kumar Dohare