Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20435 of 2018 Petitioner :- Satyaram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Rajeev Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.K.Verma, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash the externment order 31.5.2018 passed by the District Magistrate, Farrukhabad respondent no.3, in Case No.473 of 2017 (State vs. Satyaram), under Section 3/4 U.P. Control of Goondas Act, Police Station -Nawabganj, District Farrukhabad by which the petitioner has been banished from entering the limits of District Farrukhabad as well as to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur, respondent no.2, to decide Appeal No.01682 of 2018, Computerized Case No. C-201803000001682 under section 6 of U.P. Control of Goondas Act along with the stay application within a stipulated period.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that although the petitioner has filed an appeal before the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur, respondent no.2 against the order of externment dated 31.5.2018 passed by the respondent no.3 but till date neither the appeal has been heard for admission nor the stay application filed therein has been considered by the respondent no.2 and the district authorities. On account of non-consideration of the stay application filed in the aforesaid appeal, the police is harassing the petitioner, hence a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's appeal within a time bound period fixed by this court or at least to consider the stay application of the petitioner filed along with appeal.
Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the petitioner.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we direct the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of externment dated 31.5.2018 passed by the respondent no.3, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, before him. It is further directed that the stay application filed in the aforesaid appeal shall be decided by the respondent no.2 within a period of six weeks from the aforesaid date.
For a period of six weeks or till disposal of the stay application in the aforesaid appeal, whichever is earlier, the externment order 31.5.2018 passed by respondent no. 3 in the aforesaid case shall remain stayed.
In case the petitioner fails to file a certified copy of this order before the Commissioner concerned within ten days from today, then this writ petition shall stand automatically dismissed and the petitioner shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order.
With the aforesaid observations this writ petition is finally disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2018 AU