Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Satyapal And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|03 February, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 269 of 2021 Petitioner :- Satyapal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Saran
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Order on the Correction Application No.2 of 2021 From perusal of the record, it is clear that by inadvertent mistake, paragraph 3 has been written in the order dated 25.01.2021 which is quoted as follows:-
"On the other hand it is argued by Sri Vivek Saran, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 that amount of compensation has already been deposited by the department in the court below and since the petitioner himself was absent on so many dates, the same was not released in favour of the petitioner."
Therefore, the paragraph No.3 is deleted from the order dated 25.01.2021.
The correction application is allowed accordingly.
Order Date :- 3.2.2021 saqlain
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyapal And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
03 February, 2021
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Harish Chandra