Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satyam Porwal @ Shyam Lala vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32176 of 2018 Applicant :- Satyam Porwal @ Shyam Lala Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Vijay Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the first information report. His name as an accused in the present case surfaced for the first time in the second statement of the injured which was recorded after seven days of the incident. The implication of the applicant in the present case is false and after thought. He next submitted that the medical report of the injured shows that the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. He further submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 6.7.2018.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Let the applicant Satyam Porwal @ Shyam Lala involved in Case Crime No. 622 of 2018, under Sections 395, 307 and 412 I.P.C., P.S. Auraiya, district-Auraiya be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two heavy sureties (one should be of his family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyam Porwal @ Shyam Lala vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Vijay Singh Sengar