Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to delete respondent no.3 who was Sub Divisional Magistrate at the relevant time. Prayer is accepted. Let respondent no.3 be deleted from the array of the parties. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Cause shown is sufficient. Delay in filing restoration application is condoned. Restoration application is allowed. Order dated 3.7.2009 dismissing the writ petition under Chapter XII Rule-4 of the High Court Rules is set aside. Writ petition is restored. Order Date :- 1.11.2010 RS Hon'ble Sibghat Ullah Khan,J.
Restored.
For order see order of date passed on the restoration application. Order Date :- 1.11.2010 RS Hon'ble Sibghat Ullah Khan,J.
Writ petition is restored.
As respondent no.3 has been deleted from the array of the parties hence there is no question of taking steps to serve any one. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 is already represented by learned standing counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the merit of the writ petition. Judgment reserved.
Until delivery of judgment interim order dated 29.1.1991 shall remain in operation. Order Date :- 1.11.2010 RS