Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32764 of 2019 Applicant :- Satyam Kashyap Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Priyanka Devi
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Satyam Kashyap with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 678 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, section 3(2) (V) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and section 7/8 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Police Station Kotwali-Orai, District- Jalaun, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is further submitted that victim has admitted in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.c. that she went with applicant of her own freewill to Bhind and then Gowalior and from Gowalior to Guna and they stayed in hotel at Guna and then went to Indore, thereafter she realised her mistake and came back.There is no allegation against the applicant. As per First Information Report victim is aged about seventeen years. The applicant is languishing in jail since 20.6. 2019, who is not a previous convict. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Satyam Kashyap involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019 Atul kr. sri.