Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Satya Ram Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43539 of 2021 Applicant :- Satya Ram Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Deepak Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 0207/2021, under Sections 3(1) of U.P. Gangster And Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Basgaon, District Gorakhpur with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It was submitted that there is no material against the applicant to invoke the provisions of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act and that applicant does not fall within the ambit of Gangster. It was further submitted that in the gang chart, only one case has been shown against the applicant, in which he is already on bail, copy of which have been annexed as annexure no. 3 to the bail application. It was further stated that in case, applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial and he is languishing in jail since 13.09.2021.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
Let the applicant Satya Ram Yadav involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant will not try to contact, threat or otherwise influence any of the witness of the case.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 Anand
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satya Ram Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 October, 2021
Judges
  • Raj Beer Singh
Advocates
  • Amish Kumar Srivastava Deepak Agarwal