Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satya Pal Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 34610 of 2018 Petitioner :- Satya Pal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Kakkar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F. I. R. which has been registered as Case Crime No. 235 of 2018 u/s 376, 506 IPC and 4 POCSO Act PS Kurara District Hamirpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by the complainant-respondent containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioner(s) with the ulterior intention of harassing the petitioners; the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of previous enmity which admittedly exists and in this regard certain documents have been annexed in support of the writ petition; reliance has been placed on the statement of the mother who clearly says that "aisi ko ghatna nahi hui hai"; she has also stated in her statement that no medical examination of the girl was done; apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F.I.R., no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioner(s) in the commission of alleged offence and hence the impugned F.I.R. which is a bundle of lies and motivated by malice, is liable to be quashed.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the impugned F. I. R., it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out, hence the impugned F.I.R. is not liable to be quashed.
Having heard the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned first information as well as the other material brought on record, we are not inclined to quash the impugned F.I.R.
However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction that the petitioner(s) shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. However, petitioner(s) shall participate and co- operate with the investigation and police authorities shall conclude the investigation within three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.11.2018 SP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satya Pal Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 November, 2018
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Gaurav Kakkar