Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satya Pal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2532 of 2019 Petitioner :- Satya Pal Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner is complaining about the police atrocities. The grievance of the petitioner can be more appropriately looked into by the Human Rights Commission, U.P. The petitioner may, therefore, approach the Commission, if so advised.
In view of the above remedy, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.1.2019 S. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satya Pal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 January, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Rajnish Dubey

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.