Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satya Pal Singh vs State Of U P Thru ' Cane Commissioner

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48694 of 2003 Petitioner :- Satya Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Cane Commissioner, U.P. Lucknow & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tej Prakash
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel and Sri Tez Prakash, Advocate, are present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondent no. 3 (Chief Manager) to refund the amount with 18% which has deducted amount from his salary of the petitioner from April, 1999 to December, 1999.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satya Pal Singh vs State Of U P Thru ' Cane Commissioner

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Yadav