Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Satya Narayan Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18342 of 2021 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Saroj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that against cancellation order dated 24.6.2021 his client has preferred an appeal under Clause 13 Uttar Pradesh Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016, which is pending consideration before Appellate Authority.
3. In view of the said fact, the writ petition is dismissed as the petitioner has already availed the alternative remedy of appeal.
4. However, the Appellate Authority is directed to conclude the proceedings preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order from the website of this Court.
Order Date :- 22.9.2021 Kushal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satya Narayan Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Advocates
  • Saroj Kumar Pandey