Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Saty Nam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42787 of 2018 Petitioner :- Saty Nam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mathura Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The petitioner who is a complainant is aggrieved by the fact that after the Gaon Sabha informed the Assistant Collector, Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur about the encroachment which was done by the encroacher, no further action was being taken and no notice under Form-20 was being issued.
Learned Standing counsel submits that further proceedings as per the law would be undertaken by the State respondents.
It is, therefore, directed that if and only if the State authorities are of the view that notices have to be issued under Form-20 they may so proceed.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Mohit Kushwaha
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Saty Nam vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Mathura Prasad Mishra