Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satpal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27686 of 2016 Applicant :- Satpal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Shukla,Sunil Vashisth Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Shiv Vilas Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sunil Vashisth, learned counsel for applicant, learned AGA for State and perused the material available on record.
2. The present bail application has been moved by accused-applicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No. 2963 of 2013, under Sections 498-A, 304B, 316 I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Police Station Loni, District Ghaziabad.
3. Learned counsel for applicant submitted that applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in First Information Report and there was fire in his house which caused burn injuries to his wife but as per prosecution version, due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry, applicant and others have set Informant's daughter on fire on account of which she sustained severe burn injuries. FIR has also not been lodged by applicant or his family members but by mother of deceased.
4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find it a fit case where applicant should be enlarged on bail.
5. Subject to above observation, bail application of applicant is rejected.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satpal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ramesh Kumar Shukla Sunil Vashisth