Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satpal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27569 of 2019 Petitioner :- Satpal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshitij Shailendra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brijesh Ojha
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Kshitij Shailendra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the record.
Perusal of the record transpires that the present petition is highly barred by the laches, besides, the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate as to why the order passed in the writ petition in the year 1997 has not been brought on record.
We are of the considered opinion that the petitioner may raise his grievance by filing a suit against the Municipality concerned, as per the remedy available to him under the law.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed subject to the above liberty.
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Deepika
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satpal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Kshitij Shailendra