Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Satpal vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 18088 of 2021 Applicant :- Satpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ranjeet Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 123 of 2020, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kanth, District Moradabad.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A., and after perusing the averments made in the present bail application as well as rejection order, this Court is of the opinion, that learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any good ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the applicant is hereby rejected.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satpal vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Ranjeet Kumar Yadav