Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satish Yadav @ Bachcha Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20439 of 2018 Applicant :- Satish Yadav @ Bachcha Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R P Rajan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 251 of 2016, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 353, 332, 333, 307, 323, 336, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S. Cantt., district-Varanasi and is in jail since 16.4.2016, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused Haider Ali has already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 25.5.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 17388 of 2016, hence the present applicant is also entitled for the same relief.
The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.
In view of the above, let the applicant, Satish Yadav @ Bachcha Yadav be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 251 of 2016, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 353, 332, 333, 307, 323, 336, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S. Cantt., district-Varanasi with the following conditions :-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish Yadav @ Bachcha Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • R P Rajan