Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35499 of 2018 Petitioner :- Satish Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. C.P. Upadhyay,Prathamesh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Heard Sri Prathamesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dadri to decide the interim injunction application filed in the Partition Suit No. 179/2018 within a stipulated time and also to decide Partition Suit No. 179/2018 within a time bound period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondent no. 2, the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Dadri, district Gautam Budh Nagar is directed to decide the aforesaid interim injunction application, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one month and the suit itself may also be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments and giving short dates provided there is no other legal impediment.
A reference may also be made to the judgments of this Court in the cases of Chandra Bali vs. Additional Commissioner and others, 2012 (4) ADJ 13 and Radha Devi vs. State of U.P. and others, 2016 (6) ADJ 753 wherein directions for time bound disposal of such cases have been given and provisions of U.P. Janhit Guarantee Adhiniyam, 2011 have been considered.
With the aforesaid observations, present writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018 p.s.