Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satish vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39620 of 2018 Petitioner :- Satish Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
This writ petition has been filed against the orders dated 3.7.2004 passed by the Tehsildar under Section 122-B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950, and the revisional order dated 22.8.2005 passed by the Collector, Ghaziabad. The petitioner has approached the Court very belatedly and, therefore, this Court cannot interfere with the impugned orders.
However, since it has been stated in paragraph 22 of the writ petition that the petitioner is still in possession, the petitioner may claim regularization of his possession under the relevant provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 praveen.
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Raj Kumar Singh