Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Satish T G And Others vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|27 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9623/2016 BETWEEN:
1. SATISH T G S/O GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2. NARAYANASWAMY S/O GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. MANJUNATH S/O VENKATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 4. VENKATARAVANA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 5. ASHOK T V S/O VENKATARAMANA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, THE PETITIONER No.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENT OF THOOPALLI VILLAGE, NELAVANKI HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DIST-563135.
6. ANNEPPA T G S/O GANGULAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 7. SHANKARAPPA T N S/O NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 8. NAGARAJA S/O VENKATARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 9. MURALI S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 10. SRINIVAS T G S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 11. NARASIMHAPPA T K S/O LATE KADIRAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, THE PETITIONERS NO.6 TO 11 ARE RESIDENT OF THAMMIREDDYGAARIPALLI VILLAGE, NELAVANKALI HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK 563135 KOLAR DIST., 12. RAVANAPPA M Y S/O YARRAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 13. RAGHAVENDRA M K S/O M N KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 14. RAVANNAPPA @ M G VENKATARAVANAPPA S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, THE PETITIONERS NO.12 TO 14 ARE RESIDENT OF AT MANCHINEELUKOTE VILLAGE, NELAVANKALI HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DIST-563135. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI SRINATHA D R., ADV.) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAYALPAD P S SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563135 REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR , ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.
(BY SRI S.VISHWA MURTHY, HCGP) …RESPONDENT THIS CRL. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CR.NO.7/2016 OF RAYALPAD P.S., KOLAR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143,147,148,323,324,354,448,427,435,504,506 R/W 149 OF IPC AND SEC.3(1)(x)(xi) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
:O R D E R:
After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is taken on record. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
BSR Sd/-
JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish T G And Others vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2017
Judges
  • P S Dinesh Kumar