Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Satish Kumar Gupta @ Guman And Ors. vs The State Of U.P And Anr.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the nature of controversy, Poonam Singh D/o Bahadur Singh R/o Village Bihara, P.S. Mawai, District Faizabad, is directed to be impleaded as respondent no.3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that it is evident from the statement of added respondent no.3 recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Annexure 4) that no offence under Section 363, 366 or 376 I.P.C. has been committed and yet the petitioners are being proceeded against.
It has been asserted that Poonam eloped with petitioner no.1 of her own accord and had physical relations with him. The two got married.
Issue notice to Respondent No.3 for 04.7.2012.
Let Satish Kumar Gupta and respondet no.3 remain present in court on the next date of listing.
List on 04.7.2012.
Order Date :- 29.5.2012 A.Nigam
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish Kumar Gupta @ Guman And Ors. vs The State Of U.P And Anr.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2012
Judges
  • Ajai Lamba