Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satish Chandra Sharma vs State Of Up And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30101 of 2018 Applicant :- Satish Chandra Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
By means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed that the court below be directed to decide the Complaint Case No. 1137/IX/12 (Satish Vs. Pappu) under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Highway Mathura, District-Mathura, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Mathura.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that the court below shall proceed to decide the above mentioned criminal case with all expedition without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and by fixing short dates.
With the aforesaid directions, this application stands finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 17.9.2018 YK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish Chandra Sharma vs State Of Up And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 September, 2018
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Manoj Kumar Pandey