Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satish Chandra @ Jitendra Pal Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36571 of 2015 Applicant :- Satish Chandra @ Jitendra Pal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Kumar,Brij Raj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey,Sushil Kumar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Ms. Shweta Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Brij Raj Singh, learned counsel for applicant, states that by efflux of time this application has rendered infructuous since trial has completed and applicant has been convicted.
2. Application is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish Chandra @ Jitendra Pal Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Surendra Kumar Brij Raj Singh

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.