IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.5491 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN SATEESH JAIWANT PARULEKAR S/O JAIWANT AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SUPERVISOR, SVT CONSTRUCTIONS TYVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE - 562 125 BIDARAGUPPE POST SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. H G SANDHYA VIJAYKUMAR, ADV.) AND 1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM NO.1, DOOR SAMPARK BHAVAN, S. V. ROAD, HALASURU, BENGALURU 560 042.
2. THE GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM, G K RAM BUILDING HABBUWADA KARWAR - 581 306 UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT.
3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER YELLAPURA SUB-DIVISION YELLAPURA - 581 359 LECOM, BSNL, KARWAR - 581 301 UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H. G. SANDHYA VIJAYKUMAR, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 04.02.2017 AND 27.03.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-F AND G FOR PAYMENT OF BALANCE OF AMOUNT PAYABLE TO THE PETITIONER BY ISSUING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Smt.H.G.Sandhya Vijaykumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Taking into account the order, which this Court proposes to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents.
3. In this petition, petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider and decide the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 04.02.2017 and 27.03.2017.
4. When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed of in terms of the relief as prayed for.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to decide the representations dated 04.02.2017 and 27.03.2017 as per Annexures-‘F’ and ‘G’ by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE VMB