Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sarvnam vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8141 of 2021 Applicant :- Sarvnam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pramod Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 721 of 2018, under Sections 419, 420, 466, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Saini, District- Kaushambi.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 Ashish Pd.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sarvnam vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Ramesh Kumar Pandey