Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sarvesh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15574 of 2018 Applicant :- Sarvesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri S.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was granted bail in the aforesaid case on 1.10.2015 and thereafter he regularly attend the Court for two years. He next submitted that in order to earn his livelihood the applicant was compelled to travel to Punjab and as a result thereof he could not appear before the trial court on few dates and his bail was cancelled whereupon he surrendered before the trial court on 20.3.2018 and since then he is in jail.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that non appearance of the applicant before the trial court on few dates was not deliberate but due to the reason stated herein above. He next submitted that the applicant shall attend the court each and every date in future and co-operate in the expeditious disposal of the trial.
He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.3.2018.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Sarvesh involved in Case Crime No. 505 of 2015, under Section 307 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, district-Mainpuri be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sarvesh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Sunil Kumar Srivastava