Court No. - 7
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23914 of 2019 Applicant :- Sartaj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.8 of 2019, under Section 8 Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Ajeetmal, District Auraiya with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The contention as raised at the bar by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that applicant has not been arrested on the spot; that no recovery has been made from the possession of applicant; that there is no independent witness of the alleged recovery; that co-accused Boby, Kasim and Sadik have already been granted bail by the Sessions Court vide orders dated 10.04.2019, 23.04.2019 and 02.04.2019, respectively; that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity; that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial and that he is languishing in jail since 06.04.2019 and criminal history of the applicant has been duly explained in the affidavit.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
Let the applicant Sartaj involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial Court
(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.
(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or temper with the evidence.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it would be open to the prosecution to move for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 10.6.2019 Atul