IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No.469 of 2018 (PAR) Between:
SMT. SAROJAMMA WIFE OF LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHANNARAYANAHALLI VILLAGE, YANAMALAPADI POST, MUNGANDHALLI HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI SRINIVASA MURTHY S.R., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) And:
1. SMT. BYAMMA WIFE OF LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALLARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MINDIGAL POST, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
2. SRI.N.K.MAHESH SON OF LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALLARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MINDIGAL POST, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
3. KUM.MALASHREE DAUGHTER OF LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALLARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MINDIGAL POST, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
4. KUM.MONIKA DAUGHTER OF LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALLARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MINDIGAL POST, MUNGANAHALLI HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., READ WITH ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 30.03.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.137/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHINTAMANI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED : 30.06.2012 PASSED IN O.S.No.353/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHINTAMANI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 19.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge KPS